Jonathan Frederik Jupke

• Pervasive human impacts rapidly change freshwater biodiversity. Frequently recorded exceedances of regulatory acceptable thresholds by pesticide concentrations suggest that pesticide pollution is a relevant contributor to broad-scale trends in freshwater biodiversity. A more precise pre-release Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) might increase its protectiveness, consequently reducing the likelihood of unacceptable effects on the environment. European ERA currently neglects possible differences in sensitivity between exposed ecosystems. If the taxonomic composition of assemblages would differ systematically among certain types of ecosystems, so might their sensitivity toward pesticides. In that case, a single regulatory threshold would be over- or underprotective. In this thesis, we evaluate (1) whether the assemblage composition of macroinvertebrates, diatoms, fishes, and aquatic macrophytes differs systematically between the types of a European river typology system, and (2) whether these taxonomical differences engender differences in sensitivity toward pesticides. While a selection of ecoregions is available for Europe, only a single typology system that classifies individual river segments is available at this spatial scale - the Broad River Types (BRT). In the first two papers of this thesis, we compiled and prepared large databases of macroinvertebrate (paper one), diatom, fish, and aquatic macrophyte (paper two) occurrences throughout Europe to evaluate whether assemblages are more similar within than among BRT types. Additionally, we compared its performance to that of different ecoregion systems. We employed multiple tests to evaluate the performances, two of which were also designed in the studies. All typology systems failed to reach common quality thresholds for the evaluated metrics for most taxa. Nonetheless, performance differed markedly between typology systems and taxa, with the BRT often performing worst. We showed that currently available, European freshwater typology systems are not well suited to capture differences in biotic communities and suggest several possible amelioration. In the third study, we evaluated whether ecologically meaningful differences in sensitivity exist between BRT types. To this end, we predicted the sensitivity of macroinvertebrate assemblages across Europe toward Atrazine, copper, and Imidacloprid using a hierarchical species sensitivity distribution model. The predicted assemblage sensitives differed only marginally between BRT types. The largest difference between median river type sensitivities was a factor of 2.6, which is far below the assessment factor suggested for such models (6), as well as the factor of variation commonly observed between toxicity tests of the same species-compound pair (7.5 for copper). Our results don’t support the notion that a type-specific ERA might improve the accuracy of thresholds. However, in addition to the taxonomic composition the bioavailability of chemicals, the interaction with other stressors, and the sensitivity of a given species might differ between river types.