Philipp Herzog, Tobias Kube, Julian Rubel

• Monitoring of patient-reported outcomes and providing therapists with progress feedback has been shown to be beneficial for treatment outcomes (e.g., by preventing therapy failures). Despite recent advances in monitoring and feedback research, little is known about why some therapists benefit from feedback more than others. Addressing this issue, the present article uses the basic science literature on belief updating to propose a theoretical model for these between-therapist differences. In doing so, we provide a novel framework that allows testable hypotheses about when and how feedback on therapy progress is likely to improve treatment outcomes. In particular, we argue that the integration of feedback and its effect on therapists’ behavior depends on the weight therapists assign to their prior beliefs regarding treatment progress relative to the weight of the feedback received. We conclude by outlining some directions for future research on the underpinnings of this model, and point to some implications for the training of therapists and provision of feedback.