Risk management is an indispensable component of the financial system. In this context, capital requirements are built by financial institutions to avoid future bankruptcy. Their calculation is based on a specific kind of maps, so-called risk measures. There exist several forms and definitions of them. Multi-asset risk measures are the starting point of this dissertation. They determine the capital requirements as the minimal amount of money invested into multiple eligible assets to secure future payoffs. The dissertation consists of three main contributions: First, multi-asset risk measures are used to calculate pricing bounds for European type options. Second, multi-asset risk measures are combined with recently proposed intrinsic risk measures to obtain a new kind of a risk measure which we call a multi-asset intrinsic (MAI) risk measure. Third, the preferences of an agent are included in the calculation of the capital requirements. This leads to another new risk measure which we call a scalarized utility-based multi-asset (SUBMA) risk measure. In the introductory chapter, we recall the definition and properties of multi-asset risk measures. Then, each of the aforementioned contributions covers a separate chapter. In the following, the content of these three chapters is explained in more detail: Risk measures can be used to calculate pricing bounds for financial derivatives. In Chapter 2, we deal with the pricing of European options in an incomplete financial market model. We use the common risk measures Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall to define good deals on a financial market with log-normally distributed rates of return. We show that the pricing bounds obtained from Value-at-Risk may have a non-smooth behavior under parameter changes. Additionally, we find situations in which the seller's bound for a call option is smaller than the buyer's bound. We identify the missing convexity of the Value-at-Risk as main reason for this behavior. Due to the strong connection between the obtained pricing bounds and the theory of risk measures, we further obtain new insights in the finiteness and the continuity of multi-asset risk measures. In Chapter 3, we construct the MAI risk measure. Therefore, recall that a multi-asset risk measure describes the minimal external capital that has to be raised into multiple eligible assets to make a future financial position acceptable, i.e., that it passes a capital adequacy test. Recently, the alternative methodology of intrinsic risk measures was introduced in the literature. These ask for the minimal proportion of the financial position that has to be reallocated to pass the capital adequacy test, i.e., only internal capital is used. We combine these two concepts and call this new type of risk measure an MAI risk measure. It allows to secure the financial position by external capital as well as reallocating parts of the portfolio as an internal rebooking. We investigate several properties to demonstrate similarities and differences to the two aforementioned classical types of risk measures. We find out that diversification reduces the capital requirement only in special situations depending on the financial positions. With the help of Sion's minimax theorem we also prove a dual representation for MAI risk measures. Finally, we determine capital requirements in a model motivated by the Solvency II methodology. In the final Chapter 4, we construct the SUBMA risk measure. In doing so, we consider the situation in which a financial institution has to satisfy a capital adequacy test, e.g., by the Basel Accords for banks or by Solvency II for insurers. If the financial situation of this institution is tight, then it can happen that no reallocation of the initial endowment would pass the capital adequacy test. The classical portfolio optimization approach breaks down and a capital increase is needed. We introduce the SUBMA risk measure which optimizes the hedging costs and the expected utility of the institution simultaneously subject to the capital adequacy test. We find out that the SUBMA risk measure is coherent if the utility function has constant relative risk aversion and the capital adequacy test leads to a coherent acceptance set. In a one-period financial market model we present a sufficient condition for the SUBMA risk measure to be finite-valued and continuous. Finally, we calculate the SUBMA risk measure in a continuous-time financial market model for two benchmark capital adequacy tests.

The knowledge of structural properties in microscopic materials contributes to a deeper understanding of macroscopic properties. For the study of such materials, several imaging techniques reaching scales in the order of nanometers have been developed. One of the most powerful and sophisticated imaging methods is focused-ion-beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), which combines serial sectioning by an ion beam and imaging by a scanning electron microscope. FIB-SEM imaging reaches extraordinary scales below 5 nm with large representative volumes. However, the complexity of the imaging process results in the addition of artificial distortion and artifacts generating poor-quality images. We introduce a method for the quality evaluation of images by analyzing general characteristics of the images as well as artifacts exclusively for FIB-SEM, namely curtaining and charging. For the evaluation, we propose quality indexes, which are tested on several data sets of porous and non-porous materials with different characteristics and distortions. The quality indexes report objective evaluations in accordance with visual judgment. Moreover, the acquisition of large volumes at high resolution can be time-consuming. An approach to speed up the imaging is by decreasing the resolution and by considering cuboidal voxel configurations. However, non-isotropic resolutions may lead to errors in the reconstructions. Even if the reconstruction is correct, effects are visible in the analysis. We study the effects of different voxel settings on the prediction of material and flow properties of reconstructed structures. Results show good agreement between highly resolved cases and ground truths as is expected. Structural anisotropy is reported as resolution decreases, especially in anisotropic grids. Nevertheless, gray image interpolation remedies the induced anisotropy. These benefits are visible at flow properties as well. For highly porous structures, the structural reconstruction is even more difficult as a consequence of deeper parts of the material visible through the pores. We show as an application example, the reconstruction of two highly porous structures of optical layers, where a typical workflow from image acquisition, preprocessing, reconstruction until a spatial analysis is performed. The study case shows the advantages of 3D imaging for optical porous layers. The analysis reveals geometrical structural properties related to the manufacturing processes.

LinTim is a scientific software toolbox that has been under development since 2007, giving the possibility to solve the various planning steps in public transportation. Although the name originally derives from "Lineplanning and Timetabling", the available functions have grown far beyond this scope. This document is the documentation for version 2021.12. For more information, see https://www.lintim.net

Im Projekt MAFoaM - Modular Algorithms for closed Foam Mechanics - des Fraunhofer ITWM in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Fraunhofer IMWS wurde eine Methode zur Analyse und Simulation geschlossenzelliger PMI-Hartschäume entwickelt. Die Zellstruktur der Hartschäume wurde auf Basis von CT-Aufnahmen modelliert, um ihr Verformungs- und Versagensverhalten zu simulieren, d.h. wie sich die Schäume unter Belastungen bis hin zum totalen Defekt verhalten. In der Diplomarbeit wird die bildanalytische Zellrekonstruktion für PMI-Hartschäume automatisiert. Die Zellrekonstruktion dient der Bestimmung von Mikrostrukturgrößen, also geometrischer Eigenschaften der Schaumzellen, wie z.B. Mittelwert und Varianz des Zellvolumens oder der Zelloberfläche.

The high complexity of civil engineering structures makes it difficult to satisfactorily evaluate their reliability. However, a good risk assessment of such structures is incredibly important to avert dangers and possible disasters for public life. For this purpose, we need algorithms that reliably deliver estimates for their failure probabilities with high efficiency and whose results enable a better understanding of their reliability. This is a major challenge, especially when dynamics, for example due to uncertainties or time-dependent states, must be included in the model. The contributions are centered around Subset Simulation, a very popular adaptive Monte Carlo method for reliability analysis in the engineering sciences. It particularly well estimates small failure probabilities in high dimensions and is therefore tailored to the demands of many complex problems. We modify Subset Simulation and couple it with interpolation methods in order to keep its remarkable properties and receive all conditional failure probabilities with respect to one variable of the structural reliability model. This covers many sorts of model dynamics with several model constellations, such as time-dependent modeling, sensitivity and uncertainty, in an efficient way, requiring similar computational demands as a static reliability analysis for one model constellation by Subset Simulation. The algorithm offers many new opportunities for reliability evaluation and can even be used to verify results of Subset Simulation by artificially manipulating the geometry of the underlying limit state in numerous ways, allowing to provide correct results where Subset Simulation systematically fails. To improve understanding and further account for model uncertainties, we present a new visualization technique that matches the extensive information on reliability we get as a result from the novel algorithm. In addition to these extensions, we are also dedicated to the fundamental analysis of Subset Simulation, partially bridging the gap between theory and results by simulation where inconsistencies exist. Based on these findings, we also extend practical recommendations on selection of the intermediate probability with respect to the implementation of the algorithm and derive a formula for correction of the bias. For a better understanding, we also provide another stochastic interpretation of the algorithm and offer alternative implementations which stick to the theoretical assumptions, typically made in analysis.