Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Faculty / Organisational entity
Cells depend on the continuous renewal of their proteome composition during the cell cycle and in order to replace aberrant proteins or to react to changing environmental conditions. In higher eukaryotes, protein synthesis is achieved by up to five million ribosomes per cell. With the fast kinetics of translation, the large number of newly made proteins generates a substantial burden for protein homeostasis and requires a highly orchestrated cascade of factors promoting folding, sorting and final maturation. Several of the involved factors directly bind to translating ribosomes for the early processing of emerging nascent polypeptides and the translocation of ribosome nascent chain complexes to target membranes. In plant cells, protein synthesis also occurs in chloroplasts serving the expression of a relatively small set of 60–100 protein-coding genes. However, most of these proteins, together with nucleus-derived subunits, form central complexes majorly involved in the essential processes of photosynthetic light reaction, carbon fixation, metabolism and gene expression. Biogenesis of these heterogenic complexes adds an additional level of complexity for protein biogenesis. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about co-translationally binding factors in chloroplasts and discuss their role in protein folding and ribosome translocation to thylakoid membranes.
VIPP proteins aid thylakoid biogenesis and membrane maintenance in cyanobacteria, algae, and plants. Some members of the Chlorophyceae contain two VIPP paralogs termed VIPP1 and VIPP2, which originate from an early gene duplication event during the evolution of green algae. VIPP2 is barely expressed under nonstress conditions but accumulates in cells exposed to high light intensities or H2O2, during recovery from heat stress, and in mutants with defective integration (alb3.1) or translocation (secA) of thylakoid membrane proteins. Recombinant VIPP2 forms rod-like structures in vitro and shows a strong affinity for phosphatidylinositol phosphate. Under stress conditions, >70% of VIPP2 is present in membrane fractions and localizes to chloroplast membranes. A vipp2 knock-out mutant displays no growth phenotypes and no defects in the biogenesis or repair of photosystem II. However, after exposure to high light intensities, the vipp2 mutant accumulates less HSP22E/F and more LHCSR3 protein and transcript. This suggests that VIPP2 modulates a retrograde signal for the expression of nuclear genes HSP22E/F and LHCSR3. Immunoprecipitation of VIPP2 from solubilized cells and membrane-enriched fractions revealed major interactions with VIPP1 and minor interactions with HSP22E/F. Our data support a distinct role of VIPP2 in sensing and coping with chloroplast membrane stress.
The folding of newly synthesized polypeptides requires the coordinated action of molecular chaperones. Prokaryotic cells and the chloroplasts of plant cells possess the ribosome-associated chaperone trigger factor, which binds nascent polypeptides at their exit stage from the ribosomal tunnel. The structure of bacterial trigger factor has been well characterized and it has a dragon-shaped conformation, with flexible domains responsible for ribosome binding, peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerization (PPIase) activity and substrate protein binding. Chloroplast trigger-factor sequences have diversified from those of their bacterial orthologs and their molecular mechanism in plant organelles has been little investigated to date. Here, the crystal structure of the plastidic trigger factor from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is presented at 2.6 Å resolution. Due to the high intramolecular flexibility of the protein, diffraction to this resolution was only achieved using a protein that lacked the N-terminal ribosome-binding domain. The eukaryotic trigger factor from C. reinhardtii exhibits a comparable dragon-shaped conformation to its bacterial counterpart. However, the C-terminal chaperone domain displays distinct charge distributions, with altered positioning of the helical arms and a specifically altered charge distribution along the surface responsible for substrate binding. While the PPIase domain shows a highly conserved structure compared with other PPIases, its rather weak activity and an unusual orientation towards the C-terminal domain points to specific adaptations of eukaryotic trigger factor for function in chloroplasts.