Refine
Year of publication
- 1999 (525) (remove)
Document Type
- Preprint (397)
- Article (73)
- Doctoral Thesis (28)
- Course Material (6)
- Master's Thesis (6)
- Report (5)
- Lecture (3)
- Study Thesis (3)
- Working Paper (2)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Periodical Part (1)
Keywords
- Case-Based Reasoning (11)
- AG-RESY (6)
- Praktikum (6)
- Fallbasiertes Schliessen (5)
- HANDFLEX (5)
- Location Theory (5)
- PARO (5)
- case-based problem solving (5)
- Abstraction (4)
- Fallbasiertes Schließen (4)
Faculty / Organisational entity
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich Informatik (267)
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich Mathematik (131)
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich Physik (76)
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich Chemie (19)
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (10)
- Fraunhofer (ITWM) (6)
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich ARUBI (6)
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (5)
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich Biologie (2)
- Kaiserslautern - Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik (2)
Mechanised reasoning systems and computer algebra systems have apparentlydifferent objectives. Their integration is, however, highly desirable, since in manyformal proofs both of the two different tasks, proving and calculating, have to beperformed. Even more importantly, proof and computation are often interwoven andnot easily separable. In the context of producing reliable proofs, the question howto ensure correctness when integrating a computer algebra system into a mechanisedreasoning system is crucial. In this contribution, we discuss the correctness prob-lems that arise from such an integration and advocate an approach in which thecalculations of the computer algebra system are checked at the calculus level of themechanised reasoning system. This can be achieved by adding a verbose mode to thecomputer algebra system which produces high-level protocol information that can beprocessed by an interface to derive proof plans. Such a proof plan in turn can beexpanded to proofs at different levels of abstraction, so the approach is well-suited forproducing a high-level verbalised explication as well as for a low-level machine check-able calculus-level proof. We present an implementation of our ideas and exemplifythem using an automatically solved extended example.